Latest
Texas governor’s crackdown on data centers prompted firm to cancel projectOklahoma Energy TodayAs Texas pushback grows, counties, local leaders, and lawmakers seek a pause on new data centersThe Cool DownWhy are Texas leaders waiting until 2027 to act on data centers? | OpinionFort Worth Star-TelegramTexas Data Center Policy GuidePublic CitizenSid Miller urges Greg Abbott to call special session on data centersUSA TodayHow one AI data center listing sent Jacinto City into actionChronTexas agriculture commissioner renews push for data center regulationscbs19.tvWater development board says ‘limited’ info available about data centers for 2027 state water planCommunity ImpactGuadalupe County sued over data center development agreements | San Marcos - Buda - KyleCommunity ImpactTexas agencies outline plans to balance affordability with data center growthCommunity ImpactAI cloud company CoreWeave to fill $440M Cedar Creek data centerCommunity Impact2027 State Water Plan Receives Initial Approval Amid Concern Over Missing Data Center AnalysisTexas ScorecardAs bipartisan backlash grows, developer cancels planned data center project in East TexasKVUEIN THE NEWS: Hinojosa Calls for Data Center Moratorium Until Abbott Convenes LegislatureGina Hinojosa for Texas Governor
Tip line / free consult: 214-206-3377
BIG DATA DAMAGEThe Texas Data Center Watchdog

Water

Pearson v. Port of Morrow

All cases
In discoveryWater

Where it stands

Case lifecycle

  1. Filed

    A petition or complaint is filed, opening the case.

  2. Answer

    The defendant is served and files an answer or a plea to the jurisdiction.

  3. 3

    Discovery — current stage

    The parties exchange documents, written questions, and depositions.

  4. 4

    Motions

    Dispositive motions — summary judgment or a plea to the jurisdiction — are briefed and heard.

  5. 5

    Trial

    The case is tried to a judge or jury.

  6. 6

    Judgment

    The court enters a final judgment.

  7. 7

    Appeal

    The judgment is challenged in an appellate court.

  8. 8

    Resolved

    The case is finally resolved and closed.

Class certified; Amazon Data Services settled its share for $20.5M (March 2026); trial set for 2027 against the remaining defendants.

What the case is about

Residents of a rural Oregon groundwater area sued the Port of Morrow and several industrial and agricultural operations, alleging that nitrate-laden wastewater — including from data centers at the port — was spread on nearby farmland and contaminated drinking-water wells above federal limits. A judge certified the case as a class action. Amazon Data Services, which has run data centers in the county since 2011, agreed in March 2026 to pay $20.5 million to settle its share without admitting liability; the case continues against the remaining defendants, with trial set for 2027.

Why it matters

It is the first case in which a data-center operator has paid to resolve claims that its wastewater helped contaminate neighbors' groundwater — a concrete precedent for water-harm litigation.

Court
U.S. District Court, District of Oregon (Pendleton Division)
Docket / cause no.
2:24-cv-00362
Jurisdiction
U.S. federal — D. Or.
Plaintiffs
Morrow and Umatilla County, Oregon residents, on behalf of a certified class
Defendants
Port of Morrow, Lamb Weston, area agricultural operations, and others; Amazon Data Services settled its share
Operator
Amazon Data Services (data centers in Morrow County since 2011)
Relief sought
Class-action damages for groundwater contamination
Stolen Water
View the source (Oregon Capital Chronicle)

Last action: Amazon Data Services settled its share for $20.5M; case continues against the remaining defendants · March 31, 2026

Facing similar harm on your land?

If a data center or crypto mine is affecting the use and quiet enjoyment of your Texas property, you may have options. Talk to a Texas attorney about your specific situation — this is not about joining the case above.

Request a free consultation

Summary is our own words and describes only what the public filings assert. Nothing here characterizes the merits or predicts an outcome, and no party is described as liable before a court has ruled. This is general information, not legal advice. Follow the links above for the public record.

Call NowFree Review