Latest
Data Center Water Use in Texas Impossible to Quantify—Lawmakers Aren't Always Sure How to Reach The Operatorsdeceleration.newsTexas needs greater transparency on data centers’ water and air impactsEnvironmental Defense FundTexas chose a ‘soft approach’ with data center survey. It was so soft it flopped.San Antonio CurrentBehind the meter: Private power fuels AI data center growthFierce NetworkAll the latest updates on AI data centersThe VergeGoogle Invests $15 Billion on Data Center Buildout in ‘Texas of Europe’The Daily UpsideData center growth raises concerns over water, power use in Texascbs19.tvTexas Republicans Are Turning Against Data Centers. Will It Matter in November?The New York TimesLubbock City Council Moves To Regulate Data Center Constructiontexasscorecard.com‘We’ll pay for everything’: Company pitches $10.5B data center plans in Dauphin CountyPennLive.comAustin, Texas, lacks data center rules as officials move to track big power usersThe Cool DownData center water use in Texas: What's myth, what's realitykvue.comTexas Data Center Moratoriums Spread as Backlash GrowsCRE DailyFrom Forney to Corpus Christi, inside the Texas cities cracking down on data centersThe Real Deal
Tip line / free consult: 214-206-3377
BIG DATA DAMAGEThe Texas Data Center Watchdog

Electricity & utility

Ohio Manufacturers' Association Energy Group v. Public Utilities Commission of Ohio

All cases
On appealElectricity & utility

Where it stands

Case lifecycle

  1. Filed

    A petition or complaint is filed, opening the case.

  2. Answer

    The defendant is served and files an answer or a plea to the jurisdiction.

  3. Discovery

    The parties exchange documents, written questions, and depositions.

  4. Motions

    Dispositive motions — summary judgment or a plea to the jurisdiction — are briefed and heard.

  5. Trial

    The case is tried to a judge or jury.

  6. Judgment

    The court enters a final judgment.

  7. 7

    Appeal — current stage

    The judgment is challenged in an appellate court.

  8. 8

    Resolved

    The case is finally resolved and closed.

Appeal of the utility commission's order; briefing complete, awaiting oral argument.

What the case is about

An Ohio industrial-energy group is asking the Ohio Supreme Court to overturn a state-approved "data center tariff" for the utility AEP Ohio. The tariff requires large new data centers (25 megawatts and up) to pay for at least 85% of the power capacity they reserve for 12 years, even if they use less. The challengers argue the commission's approval was unlawful and rests on speculation about future demand. The commission is defending the tariff, which it approved in 2025.

Why it matters

It is the first appellate test of a data-center-specific electricity tariff — the same "who pays for the grid" fight Texas is heading into under its own new large-load rules.

Court
Supreme Court of Ohio
Docket / cause no.
2025-1458
Jurisdiction
Ohio (state supreme court appeal)
Plaintiffs
Ohio Manufacturers' Association Energy Group, representing large industrial energy users
Defendants
Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, defending AEP Ohio's data-center tariff
Operator
AEP Ohio (the utility whose data-center tariff is challenged)
Relief sought
Reversal of the commission's approval of the data-center tariff
View the source (Ohio Capital Journal)

Last action: Briefing completed; awaiting oral argument · March 24, 2026

Summary is our own words and describes only what the public filings assert. Nothing here characterizes the merits or predicts an outcome, and no party is described as liable before a court has ruled. This is general information, not legal advice. Follow the links above for the public record.

Call NowFree Review