Latest
Texas governor’s crackdown on data centers prompted firm to cancel projectOklahoma Energy TodayAs Texas pushback grows, counties, local leaders, and lawmakers seek a pause on new data centersThe Cool DownWhy are Texas leaders waiting until 2027 to act on data centers? | OpinionFort Worth Star-TelegramTexas Data Center Policy GuidePublic CitizenSid Miller urges Greg Abbott to call special session on data centersUSA TodayHow one AI data center listing sent Jacinto City into actionChronTexas agriculture commissioner renews push for data center regulationscbs19.tvWater development board says ‘limited’ info available about data centers for 2027 state water planCommunity ImpactGuadalupe County sued over data center development agreements | San Marcos - Buda - KyleCommunity ImpactTexas agencies outline plans to balance affordability with data center growthCommunity ImpactAI cloud company CoreWeave to fill $440M Cedar Creek data centerCommunity Impact2027 State Water Plan Receives Initial Approval Amid Concern Over Missing Data Center AnalysisTexas ScorecardAs bipartisan backlash grows, developer cancels planned data center project in East TexasKVUEIN THE NEWS: Hinojosa Calls for Data Center Moratorium Until Abbott Convenes LegislatureGina Hinojosa for Texas Governor
Tip line / free consult: 214-206-3377
BIG DATA DAMAGEThe Texas Data Center Watchdog

Electricity & utility

Ohio Manufacturers' Association Energy Group v. Public Utilities Commission of Ohio

All cases
On appealElectricity & utility

Where it stands

Case lifecycle

  1. Filed

    A petition or complaint is filed, opening the case.

  2. Answer

    The defendant is served and files an answer or a plea to the jurisdiction.

  3. Discovery

    The parties exchange documents, written questions, and depositions.

  4. Motions

    Dispositive motions — summary judgment or a plea to the jurisdiction — are briefed and heard.

  5. Trial

    The case is tried to a judge or jury.

  6. Judgment

    The court enters a final judgment.

  7. 7

    Appeal — current stage

    The judgment is challenged in an appellate court.

  8. 8

    Resolved

    The case is finally resolved and closed.

Appeal of the utility commission's order; briefing complete, awaiting oral argument.

What the case is about

An Ohio industrial-energy group is asking the Ohio Supreme Court to overturn a state-approved "data center tariff" for the utility AEP Ohio. The tariff requires large new data centers (25 megawatts and up) to pay for at least 85% of the power capacity they reserve for 12 years, even if they use less. The challengers argue the commission's approval was unlawful and rests on speculation about future demand. The commission is defending the tariff, which it approved in 2025.

Why it matters

It is the first appellate test of a data-center-specific electricity tariff — the same "who pays for the grid" fight Texas is heading into under its own new large-load rules.

Court
Supreme Court of Ohio
Docket / cause no.
2025-1458
Jurisdiction
Ohio (state supreme court appeal)
Plaintiffs
Ohio Manufacturers' Association Energy Group, representing large industrial energy users
Defendants
Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, defending AEP Ohio's data-center tariff
Operator
AEP Ohio (the utility whose data-center tariff is challenged)
Relief sought
Reversal of the commission's approval of the data-center tariff
View the source (Ohio Capital Journal)

Last action: Briefing completed; awaiting oral argument · March 24, 2026

Summary is our own words and describes only what the public filings assert. Nothing here characterizes the merits or predicts an outcome, and no party is described as liable before a court has ruled. This is general information, not legal advice. Follow the links above for the public record.

Call NowFree Review