Latest
▸Fluidstack Begins $4 Billion AI Data Center Project in Cameron County— Texas Border Business▸Fluidstack breaks ground on $4 billion data center project in Cameron County— KRGV▸Data Center Water Use in Texas Impossible to Quantify—Lawmakers Aren't Always Sure How to Reach The Operators— deceleration.news▸Texas needs greater transparency on data centers’ water and air impacts— Environmental Defense Fund▸Texas chose a ‘soft approach’ with data center survey. It was so soft it flopped.— San Antonio Current▸A.I. Data Center Pollution Poses Health Threat, Former E.P.A. Officials Warn— The New York Times▸Behind the meter: Private power fuels AI data center growth— Fierce Network▸Article | Data center defense spurs Texas groundwater fight— POLITICO Pro▸All the latest updates on AI data centers— The Verge▸Google Invests $15 Billion on Data Center Buildout in ‘Texas of Europe’— The Daily Upside▸Data center growth raises concerns over water, power use in Texas— cbs19.tv▸Texas Republicans Are Turning Against Data Centers. Will It Matter in November?— The New York Times▸Lubbock City Council Moves To Regulate Data Center Construction— Texas Scorecard▸‘We’ll pay for everything’: Company pitches $10.5B data center plans in Dauphin County— pennlive.com
Tip line / free consult: 214-206-3377
BIG DATA DAMAGEThe Texas Data Center Watchdog

Water

Imperial Valley Computer Manufacturing, LLC v. Imperial Irrigation District

All cases
FiledWater

Where it stands

Case lifecycle

  1. 1

    Filed — current stage

    A petition or complaint is filed, opening the case.

  2. 2

    Answer

    The defendant is served and files an answer or a plea to the jurisdiction.

  3. 3

    Discovery

    The parties exchange documents, written questions, and depositions.

  4. 4

    Motions

    Dispositive motions — summary judgment or a plea to the jurisdiction — are briefed and heard.

  5. 5

    Trial

    The case is tried to a judge or jury.

  6. 6

    Judgment

    The court enters a final judgment.

  7. 7

    Appeal

    The judgment is challenged in an appellate court.

  8. 8

    Resolved

    The case is finally resolved and closed.

What the case is about

A developer planning a large AI data center in California's Imperial Valley sued the Imperial Irrigation District after the district denied its request for Colorado River water to cool the facility. The developer, which says it leased farmland it would let go dormant to offset the demand, seeks roughly 260 million gallons a year and asks the court to order the district to provide the water. The district denied the request in May 2026.

Why it matters

It is a direct court fight over whether a data center can claim scarce Colorado River water — the clearest test yet of data-center water demand against existing users.

Jurisdiction
California — Imperial County
Plaintiffs
Imperial Valley Computer Manufacturing, LLC — an AI data-center developer
Defendants
Imperial Irrigation District — the regional water authority
Operator
Imperial Valley Computer Manufacturing (proposed large AI data center, Imperial County, CA)
Relief sought
Court order directing the water district to supply the requested water
Stolen Water
View the source (KPBS)

Last action: Water district denied the water request; developer filed suit · June 15, 2026

Facing similar harm on your land?

If a data center or crypto mine is affecting the use and quiet enjoyment of your Texas property, you may have options. Talk to a Texas attorney about your specific situation — this is not about joining the case above.

Request a free consultation

Summary is our own words and describes only what the public filings assert. Nothing here characterizes the merits or predicts an outcome, and no party is described as liable before a court has ruled. This is general information, not legal advice. Follow the links above for the public record.

Call NowFree Review